Target:2006-Barrett

• <section begin=author />Barrett, L.F.<section end=author />
• <section begin=year />2006<section end=year />
• <section begin=ref />Barrett 2006<section end=ref />
• <section begin=title />Are Emotions Natural Kinds?<section end=title />
• <section begin=source />Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 28-58<section end=source />
• <section begin=abstract />Laypeople and scientists alike believe that they know anger, or sadness, or fear, when they see it. These emotions and a few others are presumed to have specific causal mechanisms in the brain and properties that are observable (on the face, in the voice, in the body, or in experience) – that is, they are assumed to be natural kinds. If a given emotion is a natural kind and can be identified objectively, then it is possible to make discoveries about emotion. Indeed, the scientific study of emotion is founded on this assumption. In this article, I review the accumulating empirical evidence that is inconsistent with the view that there are kinds of emotion with boundaries that are carved in nature. I then consider what moving beyond a natural-kind view might mean for the scientific understanding of emotion.<section end=abstract />
• <section begin=response-qty />1<section end=response-qty />
• <section begin=response-list />{{#lst:response:2006-Alvarado.1|ref}} {{#lst:response:2006-Alvarado.1|formats}}<section end=response-list />